Atiku Explains Why He Won't Congratulate Buhari
Atiku Explains Why He Won’t Congratulate Buhari

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2019 election, Atiku Abubakar, has revealed the results he got from the server of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Concise News understands that the results from the server showed that Atiku defeated President Muhammadu Buhari in the election.

Advertise With Us

Atiku gave the “unique MAC address and Microsoft product ID of the INEC server” from where the results were obtained in his submission to the presidential election tribunal.

From the results announced by INEC, Buhari polled 15,191,847, while Atiku got 11,262,978 votes.

But in his petition submitted at the tribunal, Atiku alleged that he got 18,356,732 votes to defeat Buhari, who had 16,741,430 votes.

While responding, INEC noted that the results by the PDP candidate is fabricated and not from its website.

However, while reacting to INEC’s submission, the former Vice-President said the address of the server from which the results were obtained are unique to INEC.

“The Servers from which the said figures were derived belong to the first Respondent (INEC). The figures and votes were transmitted to the first Respondent’s Presidential Result’s Server 1 and thereafter aggregated in INEC_PRES_RSLT_SRV2019, whose Physical Address or unique Mac Address is 94-57-A5-DC-64-B9 with Microsoft Product ID 00252-7000000000-AA535. The above descriptions are unique to the 15t Respondent’s Server,” he said.

“There is no conjecture in the votes and scores in the table pleaded by the Petitioners. The figures are factual. The Spokesperson for the 2nd Respondent’s Campaign Organization openly admitted that the data in question was in the first Respondent’s Server when he wrote and submitted a petition to the Inspector General of Police and the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) asking the Security agencies to investigate the 2nd Petitioner herein for allegedly hacking into the Server of the 1St Respondent and obtaining the data in question.

“Specifically, Mr Festus Keyamo, SAN, the Spokesperson of the 2nd Respondent claimed in the said petition that it was the first Petitioner who smuggled the data into the Server.”

It noted that “The grave errors referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 above were under the hands and signature of the first Respondent’s Chairman, (who was also the Returning Officer) in the conduct of the final collation of the results of the Presidential Election.

“The Petitioners state that the final results as declared by the first respondent are those that were transmitted online to the website of the first Respondent (”